Well, listening to what's been going on in Washington, D.C., one would surmise that our government is essentially non-functional due to a vacuum of leadership from all concerned. All those folks do is argue about who's right and which party's ideas are relevant to the discussion (a term I use in its most sarcastic sense). I thought that the point of representative government is for our "leaders" to represent the home district's wishes, desires, and needs, and then to work with other representatives to find a solution that is good for the entire country; not, draw a line in the sand and just say "NO" to every idea that comes along no matter how good or bad it may be. Also, I thought that many of these folks (the entire D.C. crowd) claim to represent a faith of some sort, in many cases, Christian. Somehow I find it really hard to believe that this is really true.
It seems from the writer's view, that the DEMs require one to staunchly believe in abortion and redefining marriage and the GOP want to cut any spending designed to help the poor and give all the "goodies" to their already rich friends. I am beginning to seriously question whether our two-party system is actually working or even good for our country any more. The Party Line has become more important than solving the problems of the people in our nation. Litmus tests abound and no real solution to the country's problems are apparent.
A while back I wrote about an idea to dissolve the party system in favor of a no-affiliation primary system and election compressed into a much shorter time span. I still think this idea merits discussion. (See the October 4 posting.)
Moreover, I believe that we really need to concern ourselves with selecting what is known as "servant-leaders" for our representatives in our legislatures and in Congress. A servant-leader isn't concerned for his or her re-election so much as solving the real problems facing our society today. A person with this style of leadership would possess these qualities:
- Is aware;
- Works for growth in people;
- Builds community; and
- Reaches out to help others.
If the leader claims to be a Christian or other person of faith, I suggest that they look at Matthew 25 and 1 Corinthians 13 and make a real, honest evaluation of their conformance to these values. Although I'm not as familiar with other faiths' scriptures, I'm certain that they have similar tenets in their sacred texts and saying. The point is that people who want to be our leaders need to take a step back and re-evaluate their reason for being in that position. And, we who elect them need to demand a higher standard for their service.